Email a friend

Essay

 

In this Issue

 

Text version



The Year That Was:
Marching Toward the Millennium

by Therese Schwartz

[Part One]

In the season of 1997-1998, I left my studio every Saturday and made the rounds of galleries in Soho, Chelsea, 57th Street. and Uptown. I saw the work of 293 artists in 240 shows. I did not include museums, private spaces or studios. All of the shows were listed somewhere and open to the public at regular hours, and, of course, the work shown also represented the taste of the gallery involved.

Twenty-five years ago I wrote a series of articles for Art in America titled "The Politicization of the Avant Garde" which recorded the art and the activities of artists in the 1960’s and early 70’s. Although I am a working artist, not a critic or historian, I have an obsessive interest in what motivates us and what kind of art is produced in a particular time and place. It’s my theory that artists are the true mirrors of a time – that although they naturally share in the social-political climate of a period, they also convert it into form. Recording this process in history creates the most reliable archives of a time. I decided to take one year in these last 1990’s and make a record of what I saw. I chose the season ending June 1998 for my study. I know that the present is not a time of break-throughs, and that each of the last years of this century is very much like the one before it and the one following.

We could label today’s culture The Age of the Individual; there are no nationwide passionate causes, and no Art Revolutions. Artists are not marching in the streets with others, or riding buses to raise hell in front of the Department of Justice. For some who might have joined fights in the past there is now fitness and food, but from what I saw this past year, we haven’t all settled for that. Searches and changes go on in studios every day; but by individuals, independent and solitary.

Experts who added another verse to the "painting is dead" lamentations were wrong again. Painting outnumbered all other media by three to one. Sculpture and Installation were about even, and Video, Photography, Drawing and Performance made a small minority. Sources came from everywhere: movies, nature, science, science fiction, myth, politics, rock, fashion – a fair exchange since so much content of cinema, television and advertising comes from the wild art of the 60’s and 70’s. This diversity was by no means a free-for-all. Whatever its quality, work shown was impeccably executed; galleries rarely included amateurish attempts, however sincere. Considering the cost of gallery operation today this is no surprise. Resembling the political climate of the country, a strong center characterized the philosophic intent of almost all work seen. There were few strong statements, protests, or "throw away" art objects. In one area there was a noticeable change in style, and that was in installations.

Installation and the Stock Market:

Installation is the youngest member of the exhibition family. It first appeared in the 1960’s as simple collections of found or handmade objects assembled to express an idea visually. But in the 1990’s, and coincidentally with rising Wall Street fortunes, some of the shows were designed to look like Broadway block-busters. They were big, glitzy, furnished with expensive props, and obviously needed healthy investments of money, labor and commercially produced products.

Matthew Barney’s show (Barbara Gladstone) derived from his film "Cremaster 5." The film was not shown with the work, and so it will not be discussed here. In a locked room were a triptych of photographs of Harry Houdini the magician, a glass coffin containing white manacles, and five live black pigeons dressed in white capes. (A notice assured viewers that the birds were perfectly comfortable.) A huge stepped structure made of clear plastic filled another cavernous area, and was surrounded by guarded space equipped with an alarm system. A separate gallery was hung with large production stills taken during the filming. They pictured mythic personages, the "Water Sprites," androgynous pastel figures posed against bright flowery backgrounds.

Kenny Scharf’s brilliant presentation (at Tony Shafrazi) reflected significant sources of popular entertainment – Hollywood and Las Vegas. The walls were hung with large paintings in glaring neon-colored paint and over-life-size cartoony figures were casually placed here and there. Bright lights and rock music created an atmosphere which was both upbeat and thoroughly unreal. A structure, like a Forties trailer, was lined with black shiny stuff, had a floor covered in Mylar, and walls decorated with a collection of chochkas – souvenirs, toys, photos, cards, all hung any which way and covered with bright pink paint.

 

Todd Siler (at Ronald Feldman) took a different view of the world, and his offering dealt with the human brain. With a stated theme of "Changing Minds," he covered the walls with large paintings of abstracted skull sections, and filled all space with drawings, prints, photographs and a book, all on the same theme. The centerpiece was a roughly constructed teepee-like structure, but the expansive nature of the installation was demonstrated at the opening by the appearance of celebrated jazz musician Ornette Coleman and his group, who played music written for the show; every Saturday afterwards a Coleman combo performed.

I include Barbara Kruger here (at Mary Boone) because all parts of this show had to be read together to comprehend the agit-prop content. One room held a group of giant sculptures made of a plaster-like material, which depicted famous and infamous characters of the 1950’s and 60’s. They were satirical, sharp, and true to subversive sentiments of that time. There was J. Edgar Hoover, an enemy of all deviation, clothed in a short dress, dainty socks and shoes, and a fetching Marilyn Monroe posed over the standing figures of John F. and Robert Kennedy. Huge photographs of other public figures dominated the adjoining gallery, one of Eleanor Roosevelt, and all were underlined with typical Kruger homilies. And as part of the presentation, a real bus, decorated with similar slogans, toured the streets of Manhattan for a month.

David Bunn and Matt Mullican, conceptualists, designed installations which were theatrical, dramatic, and based on the subject of books. Bunn (at Brooke Alexander), in his first appearance in New York, presented a massive collection of bookworks, sheets of poems and videos, all of which stemmed from the discarded card catalogue of the Los Angeles Central Library. He rescued and now owns the catalogue, and this show was made largely from cards reconstituted into new books. There were also poems written on old catalogue pages, and a video – altogether several hundred pieces aptly titled "Here, There and (nearly) Everywhere."

Matt Mullican’s show (also at Brooke Alexander) took the expansion of Conceptualism even farther and it became academia writ very, very large. This presentation, saturated with huge charts and dense illustrations, awed this viewer, but its possible relevance remains somewhat beyond reach. Mullican has worked on his "New Edinburgh Encyclopedia" for six years, and this show is based on the 449 engravings he made for the sixteen volumes of the encyclopedia. The process used was complicated and skillful, and the erudition truly impressive.

Jason Rhodes’s installation (at David Zwirner) is in another place, and it isn’t academia. He is concerned with disorder, debris and possible chaos, but his style – designed to look that way – is not a result of haphazard thought. Much care must be taken to make credible chaos, and this show which was crammed into a limited gallery space made its point. Intricate machines moved and writhed, there was constant noise and one felt irritated and restless while avoiding treading on the hose, the pipes and industrial debris that covered the floor. This show, which could be seen as thrown together any old way, actually needed the same careful planning and complicated manufactured props as any of the installations described here.

These enhanced installations all needed substantial support for their creation, even though some were obviously aimed at a comparatively small and select audience. The fact that they were there to be seen is indeed a true reflection of this time.

[The Year That Was:  Marching Toward the Millennium will continue in Issues #2 through #4.]

Therese Schwartz, an esteemed artist known for her geometrically based panoramic collages, has had numerous solo exhibitions, both domestically and internationally, including: Humphrey Fine Art in New York City; Bucknell University; The Salt Lake City Art Center; Barbara Friedler Gallery and Howard University in Washington, D.C.; Galerie Fabian Walter, Basel, Switzerland; Galeria Casa Negret, Bogota, Colombia; Rutgers University; and at the ARCO International Art Fair in Madrid. Her highly regarded works can be found in museums, corporations, and private art collections, among them: The Brooklyn Museum of Art; The Corcoran Gallery of Art; Syracuse University Art Collection; Herbert F. Johnson Museum; Edwin A. Ulrich Museum; Ciba-Geigy Corporation; Barnet Arden Collection; Phillips Memorial Gallery; Women's Interart Center Museum; Advanced Elastomer Systems; Pepsico Corporation; Monroe Geller Foundation; and the Huntington Museum. An accomplished essayist, Ms. Schwartz has written feature articles in such publications as: Art News, Arts Magazine, Women Artists' News, and Art In America, where she contributed a four-part series entitled "The Politicization of the Avante-Garde," which continues to be widely used as a research tool for art historians.

 

Arts4All.com